DEC proposes new Marcellus Shale drilling safety measures, mitigation strategies | |
ALBANY - The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation released a draft of the Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement (SGEIS) governing potential natural gas drilling activities in the Marcellus Shale formation, Commissioner Pete Grannis announced, Wednesday.
Drilling and Post-Drilling
The SGEIS, available at www.dec.ny.gov/energy/47554.html, expands on the comprehensive Generic Environmental Impact Statement, adopted in 1992, that has prescribed the requirements for the drilling of thousands of oil and gas wells in New York State. The public comment period on the draft will be open until November 30. DEC will accept comments in writing, either via e-mail, regular mail, direct online submissions or delivered at public-information sessions. The SGEIS web page will contain detailed instructions for submitting comments. In addition, DEC soon will announce times and locations for a series of public-information sessions. For additional information regarding the draft SGEIS and background material regarding the Marcellus shale formation and gas drilling in New York State, please visit the Marcellus Shale webpage at http://www.dec.ny.gov/energy/46288.html. For information about the long history of oil and gas drilling in New York, the more than 13,000 currently active wells and production data, go to DEC's oil and gas web page, http://www.dec.ny.gov/energy/205.html. |
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
_________________________________________________________________
8748
2009-2010 Regular Sessions
IN A S S E M B L Y
June 5, 2009
___________
Introduced by M. of A. BRENNAN, COLTON, MILLMAN, FIELDS -- Multi-Spon-
sored by -- M. of A. COOK, GLICK, GOTTFRIED, MAGEE, MAISEL, NOLAN,
ROBINSON, WEISENBERG -- read once and referred to the Committee on
Environmental Conservation
AN ACT to amend the environmental conservation law, in relation to the
regulation of the drilling of natural gas resources
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
1 Section 1. Legislative intent. 1. The legislature finds that the proc-
2 ess used to stimulate natural gas extraction referred to as hydraulic
3 fracturing utilizes components that are often toxic, that are non-biode-
4 gradable, and that are virtually impossible to remove once they enter
5 the natural environment. Thus, they pose such a high level of environ-
6 mental risk that the policy of the state must be to insure they are
7 excluded from any area that is significant for public drinking water
8 resources or any other area that is environmentally sensitive.
9 2. Natural gas drilling is potentially highly transformative of rural
10 landscapes, offering economic benefits to many landowners, but threaten-
11 ing the property values of other local landowners, traditional rural
12 economic activity, the carrying capacity of local infrastructure, the
13 natural habitat of wildlife, and the public health and quality of life
14 of residents in areas where there is natural gas extraction taking
15 place. Unless these resources are protected in the permitting and regu-
16 latory processes of the state, the costs of Marcellus shale natural gas
17 extraction will exceed the benefits and natural gas extraction will
18 become a fundamentally unfair and divisive process in which the profits
19 of some are subsidized by the costs to others.
20 3. The proposed scope of natural gas drilling across the state of New
21 York will present unprecedented challenges of regulatory oversight.
22 Funding for such oversight must be sufficient to meet this challenge and
23 should come from a series of fees paid by the natural gas industry.
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD11784-03-9
A. 8748 2
1 Similarly, the natural gas industry should pay for all other costs asso-
2 ciated with natural gas extraction. Otherwise, natural gas extraction
3 will be unfairly subsidized, either by the New York state taxpayer or
4 by the impacts on local human and natural resources.
5 4. One of the chief environmental and infrastructure assets of the
6 state of New York is its drinking water systems, which play a fundamen-
7 tal role in the economic productivity and public health of the state.
8 The legislature finds that no risk to these resources and to the public
9 health of their users is acceptable and that the policy of the state
10 with respect to the management of shale gas extraction must be one of no
11 drinking water risk.
12 5. The purpose of this legislation is to insure that the exploitation
13 of shale natural gas resources is conducted in a manner that is consist-
14 ent with and supportive of New York state's commitment to sustainabili-
15 ty, and is consistent with other state economic development, energy and
16 environmental policies.
17 6. Therefore, in light of the many commitments the state of New York
18 has made to more sustainable development and the critical role greening
19 the state's economy will play in the future prosperity of the state, the
20 only acceptable natural gas extraction practices will be sustainable
21 ones. This act is intended to ensure that that goal is met.
22 S 2. Article 23 of the environmental conservation law is amended by
23 adding a new title 29 to read as follows:
24 TITLE 29
25 REGULATION OF NATURAL GAS DRILLING
26 SECTION 23-2901. NATURAL GAS DRILLING; PROHIBITION NEAR WATERSHED.
27 23-2903. DISCLOSURE OF HYDRAULIC FRACTURING MATERIALS.
28 23-2905. PROTECTION OF OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES.
29 23-2907. PROTECTION OF LOCAL RESOURCES.
30 23-2909. WATER WITHDRAWALS.
31 23-2911. ENFORCEMENT AND FINANCIAL SECURITY.
32 23-2913. OTHER PROVISIONS.
33 S 23-2901. NATURAL GAS DRILLING; PROHIBITION NEAR WATERSHED.
34 1. NATURAL GAS DRILLING SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED WITHIN THE NEW YORK
35 CITY WATERSHED OR AT ANY POINT WITHIN FIVE MILES OF ITS BOUNDARY.
36 2. NATURAL GAS DRILLING SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED WITHIN THE WATERSHED OF
37 THE DELAWARE RIVER, IN ANY RECHARGE AREA OF A SOLE SOURCE AQUIFER, IN
38 ANY AREA WHERE GROUNDWATER CONTRIBUTES A SIGNIFICANT BASE FLOW TO
39 SURFACE WATER SOURCES OF DRINKING WATER, AND IN ANY OTHER AREA WHERE THE
40 DEPARTMENT SHALL FIND PRESENTS A SIGNIFICANT THREAT OF HYDRAULIC FRAC-
41 TURING COMPOUNDS ENTERING INTO A SIGNIFICANT SOURCE OF DRINKING WATER.
42 3. NATURAL GAS DRILLING SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN WAYS THAT DO NOT CONTAM-
43 INATE DRINKING WATER WELLS. IN ANY AREA WHERE NATURAL GAS DRILLING TAKES
44 PLACE AND CONTAMINATION OF INDIVIDUAL DRINKING WATER WELLS OCCURS, THERE
45 SHALL BE A PRESUMPTION THAT THE NATURAL GAS DRILLING IS RESPONSIBLE FOR
46 SUCH CONTAMINATION UNLESS THE NATURAL GAS DRILLER CAN SHOW, BY CLEAR AND
47 CONVINCING EVIDENCE, THAT SUCH DRILLER IS NOT THE SOURCE OF THE CONTAM-
48 INATION. UPON RECEIVING A REPORT OF AN INCIDENT OF WELL CONTAMINATION
49 FROM NATURAL GAS DRILLING, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL INVESTIGATE SUCH REPORT
50 WITHIN TWENTY-FOUR HOURS AND SHALL HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO ORDER IMMEDIATE
51 REMEDIAL ACTION, INCLUDING ISSUING IMMEDIATE CEASE AND DESIST ORDERS
52 WITH RESPECT TO THE DRILLING ACTIVITY. IN THE EVENT THAT THE DEPARTMENT
53 IS UNABLE TO INVESTIGATE SUCH REPORT WITHIN TWENTY-FOUR HOURS, IT MAY
54 REQUEST THAT LOCAL OR STATE POLICE AUTHORITIES CONFIRM THE INCIDENT AND
55 REPORT AND, IF CONFIRMED, SHALL ISSUE A CEASE AND DESIST ORDER TO SUCH
A. 8748 3
1 DRILLER UNTIL IT SHALL MAKE SUCH INVESTIGATION AND DETERMINE THE PROPER
2 COURSE OF INSURING FULL REMEDIATION.
3 4. ANY SPILLS OR PROHIBITED DISCHARGES OF HYDRAULIC FRACTURING
4 COMPOUNDS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REPORTED BY THE NATURAL GAS DRILLER TO
5 THE DEPARTMENT, WHICH SHALL ESTABLISH PROCEDURES FOR RECORDING AND
6 REVIEWING SUCH REPORTS AND FOR ORDERING REMEDIAL ACTION TO CONTAIN THE
7 SPILL AND KEEP THE SPILL OR DISCHARGE INCIDENT FROM BEING REPEATED. THE
8 DEPARTMENT SHALL HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO IMPOSE FINES FOR FAILURE TO
9 REPORT SUCH INCIDENTS, TO ORDER IMMEDIATE CLEANUP OF SUCH SPILLS AT THE
10 EXPENSE OF SUCH DRILLER AND, SHOULD SUCH DRILLER FAIL TO DO SO IN A
11 TIMELY FASHION, TO ENTER INTO THE DRILLING AREA AND DO THE CLEANUP
12 ITSELF, AT THE EXPENSE OF SUCH DRILLER. IN ANY INSTANCE WHERE SUCH DRIL-
13 LER SHALL REFUSE TO CARRY OUT A DEPARTMENT CLEANUP OR REMEDIAL ACTION
14 ORDER IN A TIMELY AND APPROPRIATE MANNER, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL ORDER ALL
15 DRILLING ACTIVITY TO CEASE AND DESIST UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE SPILL HAS
16 BEEN CLEANED UP AND SUCH DRILLER HAS REMEDIATED THE CONDITIONS OR PRAC-
17 TICES THAT CAUSED THE SPILL.
18 5. ANY DRILLER OF NATURAL GAS WHO KNOWINGLY ATTEMPTS TO COVER UP A
19 SPILL OR PROHIBITED DISCHARGE SHALL BE GUILTY OF A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR.
20 ANY DRILLER OF NATURAL GAS WHO KNOWINGLY DISCHARGES HYDRAULIC FRACTURING
21 COMPOUNDS INTO THE SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE SHALL BE GUILTY OF A
22 CLASS E FELONY.
23 6. NOTHING IN THIS TITLE OR ANY OTHER LAW OR REGULATION SHALL ALTER,
24 LIMIT, IMPAIR OR OTHERWISE AFFECT THE AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW
25 YORK, OR THE AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK IN THE NEW YORK CITY
26 WATERSHED, TO TAKE WHATEVER MEASURES ARE NECESSARY UNDER THE LAW TO
27 PROTECT THE QUALITY AND SAFETY OF THE SOURCES OF THE DRINKING WATERS OF
28 NEW YORK STATE.
29 S 23-2903. DISCLOSURE OF HYDRAULIC FRACTURING MATERIALS.
30 1. ALL COMPONENTS OF HYDRAULIC FRACTURING MATERIALS SHALL BE DISCLOSED
31 TO THE DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION FOR A WELL PERMIT FOR THE
32 DRILLING OF NATURAL GAS PURSUANT TO THIS ARTICLE.
33 (A) EMERGENCY HEALTH SITUATION. WHEN A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL DETERMINES
34 THAT A MEDICAL EMERGENCY EXISTS RELATED TO A HYDRAULIC FRACTURING OPERA-
35 TION AND THE INGREDIENTS AND SPECIFIC CHEMICAL IDENTITY OF A HYDRAULIC
36 FRACTURING FLUID IS NECESSARY FOR EMERGENCY OR FIRST-AID TREATMENT, THE
37 HYDRAULIC FRACTURING OPERATOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY DISCLOSE THE SPECIFIC
38 CHEMICAL IDENTITY OF A TRADE SECRET CHEMICAL TO THE TREATING HEALTH
39 PROFESSIONAL, REGARDLESS OF THE EXISTENCE OF A WRITTEN STATEMENT OF NEED
40 OR A CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT.
41 (B) NON-EMERGENCY HEALTH SITUATION. WHEN A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL OR
42 GOVERNMENT AGENCY DETERMINES THAT THE INGREDIENTS AND SPECIFIC CHEMICAL
43 IDENTITY OF A HYDRAULIC FRACTURING FLUID ARE NECESSARY FOR MEDICAL
44 TREATMENT, AN OPERATOR SHALL DISCLOSE A SPECIFIC CHEMICAL IDENTITY TO A
45 HEALTH PROFESSIONAL OR GOVERNMENT AGENCY IF A REQUEST HAS BEEN MADE IN
46 WRITING THAT DESCRIBES WITH REASONABLE DETAIL ONE OR MORE HEALTH OR
47 SAFETY NEEDS FOR THE INFORMATION AND INCLUDES A DESCRIPTION OF THE
48 PROCEDURES TO BE USED TO MAINTAIN THE CONFIDENTIALITY OF THE DISCLOSED
49 INFORMATION. THE HEALTH PROFESSIONAL OR GOVERNMENT AGENCY SHALL AGREE IN
50 A WRITTEN CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT THAT THE TRADE SECRET INFORMATION
51 WILL NOT BE USED FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN THE HEALTH NEEDS ASSERTED
52 AND SHALL AGREE NOT TO RELEASE THE INFORMATION UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES
53 OTHER THAN TO A HEALTH PROFESSIONAL OR GOVERNMENT AGENCY.
54 2. NO NATURAL GAS DRILLER MAY CHANGE THE COMPONENTS OR COMPOSITION OF
55 HYDRAULIC FRACTURING MATERIALS FROM THOSE SPECIFIED IN ITS PERMIT APPLI-
A. 8748 4
1 CATION WITHOUT FIRST FILING FOR AND RECEIVING A MODIFICATION OF SUCH
2 PERMIT.
3 3. THE DEPARTMENT SHALL ESTABLISH A STANDARD FOR THE COMPOSITION OF
4 HYDRAULIC FRACTURING COMPOUNDS AND REQUIRE NATURAL GAS DRILLERS TO USE
5 SUCH STANDARD. THE DEPARTMENT SHALL HAVE THE POWER TO PROHIBIT THE USE
6 OF SPECIFIC CHEMICALS IN THE COMPOSITION OF HYDRAULIC FRACTURING MATERI-
7 ALS.
8 4. HYDRAULIC FRACTURING LIQUIDS AND LIQUID WASTE FROM DRILLING MAY NOT
9 BE STORED IN OPEN LAGOONS, BUT MUST BE KEPT IN CORROSION PROOF TANKS.
10 5. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW OR ADMINISTRATIVE DETER-
11 MINATION, HYDRAULIC FRACTURING MATERIAL SHALL BE REGARDED AS HAZARDOUS
12 WASTE AND TREATED AND DISPOSED OF AS SUCH.
13 6. THE DEPARTMENT SHALL ISSUE REGULATIONS REQUIRING THE TRACKING OF
14 ALL CHEMICAL COMPONENTS OF HYDRAULIC FRACTURING MATERIALS AND SHALL HAVE
15 THE POWER TO ENFORCE SUCH REGULATIONS BY APPROPRIATE FINES AND CEASE AND
16 DESIST ORDERS.
17 S 23-2905. PROTECTION OF OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES.
18 1. DRILLERS OF NATURAL GAS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MITIGATING ALL
19 DAMAGE TO ANY REGULATED ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES, INCLUDING BUT NOT
20 LIMITED TO AIR, WETLANDS, STREAM CORRIDORS, AND ENDANGERED AND THREAT-
21 ENED SPECIES HABITAT.
22 2. WELL PERMITS FOR THE DRILLING OF NATURAL GAS SHALL NOT BE GRANTED
23 IN ANY AREA WHERE SUCH DRILLING SHALL ADVERSELY IMPACT THE RECOVERY OF
24 THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES OR WHERE IT SHALL DESTROY OR DEGRADE
25 OTHER UNIQUE NATURAL OR SCENIC RESOURCES. WELL PERMITS FOR THE DRILLING
26 OF NATURAL GAS SHALL NOT BE GRANTED IN ANY AREA THAT IS DESIGNATED AS
27 FOREVER WILD UNDER THE STATE CONSTITUTION OR LAWS, IN STATE PARKS, IN
28 AREAS IDENTIFIED FOR STATE ACQUISITION AND/OR PROTECTION UNDER THE STATE
29 OPEN SPACE PLAN, OR IN STATE FORESTS AND STATE PARKS.
30 3. APPLICATIONS FOR A WELL PERMIT FOR THE DRILLING OF NATURAL GAS
31 SHALL INCLUDE AN ASSESSMENT OF ITS IMPACT ON LOCAL BIODIVERSITY
32 RESOURCES AND A SHOWING THAT SUCH DRILLING SHALL BE WITHIN THE LEASEHOLD
33 AT THE LOWEST IMPACT POINT ON WILDLIFE. TO MINIMIZE IMPACT THROUGH
34 EITHER GROUND DISTURBANCE OR TRAFFIC, ALL EFFORTS SHALL BE MADE TO CLUS-
35 TER WELLS, CENTRALIZE OPERATIONS, AND USE TELEMETRY. IF NECESSARY,
36 SEASONAL RESTRICTIONS SHALL BE IMPOSED TO PROTECT WILDLIFE BREEDING OR
37 MIGRATION.
38 4. APPLICATIONS FOR A WELL PERMIT FOR THE DRILLING OF NATURAL GAS
39 SHALL LIST ALL EXPECTED EMISSIONS OF AIR POLLUTANTS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
40 LIMITED TO, ALL GREENHOUSE GASES SUCH AS METHANE. THE DEPARTMENT SHALL
41 HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO SPECIFY LIMITS ON ALL SUCH AIR EMISSIONS AS A
42 CONDITION OF GRANTING SUCH PERMIT, TO REQUIRE APPROPRIATE EMISSIONS
43 MONITORING AND CONTROLS BY THE OPERATOR, AND TO DENY ANY PERMIT WHOSE
44 OPERATION SHALL BE INCONSISTENT WITH STATE POLICY AND REGULATIONS WITH
45 RESPECT TO ADDRESSING GLOBAL WARMING.
46 S 23-2907. PROTECTION OF LOCAL RESOURCES.
47 1. THE DEPARTMENT SHALL HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO IMPOSE FEES TO COMPEN-
48 SATE LOCAL GOVERNMENT FOR ANY COSTS OR IMPACTS IMPOSED UPON SUCH GOVERN-
49 MENTS AS A RESULT OF DRILLING FOR NATURAL GAS.
50 2. THE DEPARTMENT, IN ITS PERMITTING DECISIONS, SHALL TAKE CARE TO
51 INSURE THAT NATURAL GAS WELLS ARE SITUATED IN WAYS THAT MAXIMIZE FIELD
52 PRODUCTIVITY WHILE MINIMIZING IMPACTS ON THE LANDSCAPE. FOR THIS
53 PURPOSE, THE DEPARTMENT MAY, WITHIN SPECIFIC REGIONAL AREAS, ESTABLISH
54 PROCEDURES TO REQUIRE PERIODIC BATCH PROCESSING OF PERMIT APPLICATIONS,
55 INCLUDING MANDATORY DATES FOR APPLICATION SUBMISSION, AND MAY IMPOSE
56 WELL CLUSTERING, CENTRALIZED OPERATIONS, AND THE USE OF TELEMETRY.
A. 8748 5
1 3. ALL SITING OF NATURAL GAS DRILLING ACTIVITY SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL
2 ZONING.
3 4. ANY PERMIT HOLDER SHALL BE REQUIRED, AT THE END OF ITS DRILLING
4 OPERATIONS, TO FULLY RESTORE THE DRILL SITE TO ITS PREVIOUS NATURAL
5 CONDITION. TO ENFORCE THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SUBDIVISION, BEFORE ANY
6 LAND CLEARING OPERATIONS RELATED TO DRILLING ARE COMMENCED, SUCH PERMIT
7 HOLDER SHALL FILE WITH THE DEPARTMENT, A NON-REVOCABLE AND BANKRUPTCY
8 PROOF BOND SUFFICIENT, UNDER REGULATIONS TO BE ISSUED BY THE DEPARTMENT,
9 TO COVER ALL FORESEEABLE COSTS OF SITE RESTORATION.
10 5. GAS DRILLING OPERATIONS SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN A MANNER THAT SHALL
11 NOT BURDEN ADJACENT LANDOWNERS AND RESIDENTS. NO NOISE AUDIBLE INDOORS
12 IN RESIDENCES LOCATED ON ADJACENT PROPERTY SHALL BE PERMITTED BETWEEN
13 THE HOURS OF 8:00 PM AND 8:00 AM ON WEEKDAYS AND 6:00 PM AND 10:00 AM ON
14 WEEKENDS. SIMILARLY, NIGHT LIGHTING SHALL NOT BE OBTRUSIVE OR DISRUPTIVE
15 OF LIFE FOR SUCH ADJACENT LANDOWNERS AND RESIDENTS. THE DEPARTMENT SHALL
16 ENFORCE THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SUBDIVISION BY APPROPRIATE REGULATIONS
17 INCLUDING A SYSTEM OF FINES, AND SHALL FURTHER HAVE THE POWER TO ISSUE
18 CEASE AND DESIST ORDERS TO ENFORCE THESE PROTECTIONS AND PROTECT THE
19 QUIET ENJOYMENT OF LOCAL RESIDENTS.
20 6. LANDOWNERS FORCED INTO A PRODUCTION POOL SHALL BE ENTITLED TO
21 RECEIVE THE HIGHEST PAYMENT THAT ANY OTHER POOL MEMBER RECEIVES.
22 7. ANY LANDOWNER WHO ENTERS INTO A CONTRACT OR LEASE TO PERMIT THE
23 DRILLING FOR NATURAL GAS ON SUCH LANDOWNER'S PROPERTY SHALL HAVE A THIR-
24 TY DAY RIGHT OF RECISSION WITH RESPECT TO SUCH CONTRACT. DURING SUCH
25 THIRTY DAY PERIOD, SUCH LANDOWNER MAY CANCEL SUCH CONTRACT OR LEASE AT
26 ANY TIME WITHOUT PENALTY.
27 8. NO WELL PERMIT FOR THE DRILLING OF NATURAL GAS SHALL BE GRANTED FOR
28 A PERIOD LONGER THAN TEN YEARS. ANY PERMIT UNDER WHICH ACTUAL NATURAL
29 GAS EXTRACTION IS NOT UNDERTAKEN WITHIN FIVE YEARS SHALL EXPIRE AND BE
30 DEEMED NULL AND VOID.
31 9. THE DEPARTMENT, IN CONSULTATION WITH THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, SHALL
32 ISSUE GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS TO LANDOWNERS, WITH RESPECT TO THEIR RIGHTS
33 WITH RESPECT TO NATURAL GAS DRILLING CONTRACTS AND LEASES. THE DEPART-
34 MENT IS HEREBY AUTHORIZED TO REQUIRE STANDARD PROVISIONS IN SUCH
35 CONTRACTS OR LEASES IN ORDER TO PREVENT UNFAIR TREATMENT OF LANDOWNERS.
36 10. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, NATURAL GAS DRILLERS
37 SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS OF ALL ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE WHICH
38 OCCURRED IN THE PROCESS OF DRILLING FOR AND EXTRACTING NATURAL GAS. THE
39 DEPARTMENT MAY REQUIRE THE PROVISION OF APPROPRIATE FINANCIAL SECURITY
40 TO ENSURE LANDOWNERS ARE PROTECTED FROM ANY CONTINGENT LIABILITY. SHOULD
41 DRILLING ACTIVITY LEAD TO DESIGNATION AS A BROWNFIELD SITE, AS DEFINED
42 IN SUBDIVISION TWO OF SECTION 27-1405 OF THIS CHAPTER, SUCH DRILLER, NOT
43 THE LANDOWNER, SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO BE PARTY IN THE CHAIN OF RESPONSI-
44 BILITY.
45 S 23-2909. WATER WITHDRAWALS.
46 ALL SURFACE OR GROUNDWATER WITHDRAWALS OF MORE THAN FIVE THOUSAND
47 GALLONS A DAY FOR NATURAL GAS DRILLING PURPOSES, OR MORE THAN ONE
48 PERCENT OF IN STREAM FLOW, SHALL REQUIRE A PERMIT FROM THE DEPARTMENT.
49 THE DEPARTMENT SHALL ISSUE REGULATIONS GOVERNING SUCH WITHDRAWALS,
50 INCLUDING PROVISIONS TO ASSURE THAT WATER WITHDRAWALS ARE LIMITED TO
51 LEVELS THAT DO NOT HARM STREAM ECOLOGY OR FISHERY RESOURCES.
52 S 23-2911. ENFORCEMENT AND FINANCIAL SECURITY.
53 1. NO PERMIT FOR THE DRILLING OF NATURAL GAS SHALL BE GRANTED IF SUCH
54 APPLICANT HAS FAILED TO MEET HIS ENVIRONMENTAL AND FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS
55 UNDER A PREVIOUS PERMIT OR IF SUCH APPLICANT HAS UNPAID FINANCIAL
A. 8748 6
1 LIABILITIES TO EITHER THE STATE, A LOCAL GOVERNMENT OR A PRIVATE LAND-
2 OWNER.
3 2. IN DETERMINING WHETHER OR NOT A PERMIT FOR THE DRILLING OF NATURAL
4 GAS SHALL BE GRANTED, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL CONSIDER THE PRIOR RECORD
5 UNDER PREVIOUS PERMITS OF THE APPLICANT. APPLICANTS WHO HAVE SHOWN A
6 PATTERN OF VIOLATION OF PERMIT CONDITIONS OR A LACK OF A PROPER STANDARD
7 OF CARE IN DRILLING OPERATIONS SHALL NOT BE GRANTED A PERMIT.
8 3. A PERMIT FOR THE DRILLING OF NATURAL GAS SHALL INCLUDE APPLICABLE
9 LEASE DOCUMENTS BETWEEN THE DRILLING COMPANY AND THE LANDOWNER OR LAND-
10 OWNERS FOR THE DRILLING SITE FOR WHICH THE APPLICATION IS MADE.
11 4. A PERMIT APPLICATION SHALL INCLUDE A COMPREHENSIVE HYDROLOGICAL
12 ASSESSMENT OF THE SUBSURFACE STRATA INCLUDING THE POTENTIAL FOR ANY
13 FISSURING THAT WOULD DRAW HYDRAULIC FRACTURING FLUID, NATURAL GAS OR
14 OTHER POLLUTANTS INTO WATER BEARING AQUIFER STRATA.
15 5. THE DEPARTMENT SHALL PROVIDE FOR UNANNOUNCED INSPECTIONS OF ALL
16 NATURAL GAS DRILLING SITES AND FOR THE PROVISION OF SOIL TESTING TO
17 DETERMINE THE PRESENCE OF UNREPORTED SPILLS.
18 6. THE DEPARTMENT SHALL REQUIRE THAT ALL CASING CONSTRUCTION BE
19 CARRIED OUT IN THE PRESENCE OF INDEPENDENT QUALITY CONTROL ENGINEERS.
20 THE DEPARTMENT SHALL HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO SPECIFY STANDARDS FOR CASING
21 CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING COMPOSITION OF CONCRETE AND OTHER TECHNICAL
22 PARAMETERS FOR DEEP WELL CONSTRUCTION TO INSURE MAXIMUM CASING INTEGRITY
23 AND PREVENT LEAKAGE OF HYDRAULIC FRACTURING COMPOUNDS, NATURAL GAS AND
24 OTHER SUBSURFACE MATERIALS INTO WATER BEARING STRATA. THE DEPARTMENT
25 SHALL, OVER THE LIFE OF THE WELL, CARRY OUT PERIODIC INSPECTIONS TO
26 ENSURE THAT CASING INTEGRITY IS MAINTAINED.
27 S 23-2913. OTHER PROVISIONS.
28 1. THE STATE COMPTROLLER SHALL ANNUALLY AUDIT ALL ROYALTY PAYMENTS TO
29 THE STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, INCLUDING THE GAS PRODUCTION AND SALES
30 FIGURES ON WHICH THEY ARE BASED, AND SHALL HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO REQUIRE
31 APPROPRIATE FISCAL REPORTING AND RECORD KEEPING BY BOTH NATURAL GAS
32 PRODUCERS AND OTHER DEPARTMENTS OF STATE GOVERNMENT CHARGED WITH THEIR
33 SUPERVISION.
34 2. THE STATE COMPTROLLER SHALL HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO PERIODICALLY
35 AUDIT PAYMENTS MADE UNDER DRILLING CONTRACTS AND LEASES TO PRIVATE LAND-
36 OWNERS, INCLUDING THE GAS PRODUCTION AND SALES FIGURES ON WHICH THEY ARE
37 BASED, TO DETERMINE THAT THEY ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF
38 THE CONTRACT OR LEASE AND ALL APPLICABLE LAWS.
39 3. THE DEPARTMENT SHALL ESTABLISH AN IMPARTIAL TECHNICAL ADVISORY
40 COMMITTEE, WHOSE RESEARCH AND WORK SHALL BE SUPPORTED BY PERMIT FEES, TO
41 REVIEW AND ISSUE GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS ON GAS DRILLING BEST PRACTICES.
42 SUCH COMMITTEE SHALL INCLUDE AT LEAST ONE REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE
43 FOLLOWING INTEREST GROUPS: THE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNITY; THE PUBLIC
44 HEALTH COMMUNITY; AND THE GAS DRILLING INDUSTRY, ALONG WITH PERSONS FROM
45 THE DEPARTMENT OR OTHERS THE DEPARTMENT DEEMS APPROPRIATE. THE DEPART-
46 MENT MAY REQUIRE COMPLIANCE WITH SUCH PRACTICES AS A CONDITION OF PERMIT
47 APPROVAL.
48 S 3. This act shall take effect on the one hundred twentieth day after
49 it shall have become a law, provided, however, that effective immediate-
50 ly, the addition, amendment and/or repeal of any rule or regulation
51 necessary for the implementation of this act on its effective date is
52 authorized to be made and completed on or before such date.
____________________________________________________________________________________________
The DEC has just released the Final Scope that outlines the topics that will be reviewed in the SGEIS (Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement), expected out sometime this spring.
The SGEIS will analyze the potential impacts of shale gas development using horizontal drilling and high-volume hydraulic fracturing, with particular attention to issues associated with multi-well drilling sites. Heightened attention to the latter topic is a direct result of the scoping process, which also resulted in the following significant additions to the scope:
• Effectiveness of regulations in other oil and gas producing states where high-volume hydraulic fracturing of shale and other low-permeability reservoirs is used.
• Setbacks for multi-well sites and high volume hydraulic fracturing operations from private dwellings or buildings, surface waterbodies, private water wells and springs used for domestic water supply.
• Potential requirements for private water well sampling, testing and monitoring by gas well operators.
• Feasibility analysis of requiring use of green or non-chemical fracturing technology.
• Mechanisms to require notification, review and Department approval of re-fracturing operations.
• Specific air quality topics.
• Evaluation of a phased permitting alternative to the proposed action.
Additional background information was also added to the scope regarding topics which do not require analysis in the SGEIS because the Department already has programs in place to address them.
Lastly, the Final Scope also identifies “prominent issues that were raised during scoping and determined to be not relevant or not environmentally significant or that have been adequately addressed in a prior environmental review.” [6 NYCRR 617.8(f)(7)]
The volume and breadth of the comments received and their careful consideration allows the Department to issue this Final Scope with confidence that the SGEIS will address all relevant potentially significant adverse impacts. The Final Scope will be followed in the Spring of 2009 with a draft SGEIS, and you will have an opportunity to provide comments on that document as well.
__________________________________________________________________________________
by Tom Wilber, Staff Writer February 16, 2009
A review of regulations associated with natural gas drilling is on schedule to be completed this summer, and that could clear the way for energy companies to begin work in the Southern Tier.
Efforts to tap natural gas from the Marcellus Shale deposit were put on hold last summer while the state Department of Environmental Conservation assessed drilling's impact on water, the landscape and communities.
Officials completed another major step in that review earlier this month that laid the groundwork for a regulatory overhaul to oversee a surge in drilling volume and intensity expected with the Marcellus.
"We remain on track to complete this process in the summer," Lori Severino, a spokeswoman for the DEC, said last week. George Miner, president of Southern Tier Economic Growth in
"If that goes through, we'll be back to creating a lot of jobs here," he said
One of those sources of jobs would be Schlumberger Technology Corp., a Houston-based company in the gas exploration field that has purchased 87 acres in The Center in Horseheads for a complex where at least 300 people would work.
Miner said approval of the regulations would speed up Schlumberger's construction timetable.
"They're still going ahead with the project to service
http://www.stargazette.com/article/20090216/NEWS01/902160307/
___________________________________________________________________
Natural gas companies plan to acquire fewer leases in 2009
Friday, January 16, 2009 Pittsburgh Business Times - by Anya Litvak
No one’s knocking on Gary Sheppard’s door. And judging from the calls he gets as a gas lease educator, no one’s knocking on doors anywhere else.
The land grab in the promising Marcellus Shale has been silenced by a more pressing need: cash.
“Which makes sense because the sheer dollars going around were monstrous,” Sheppard said. “We saw them hit that $3,000 per acre mark. We saw royalty rates change. We heard 17, 18, 19 percent. Of course, we don’t hear anything now. It’s quiet as a mouse.”
For many oil and gas companies looking to secure their fortune in the natural gas reservoir that spans most of the state, the strategy was to grab first and develop later.
Of the estimated $4 billion that has gone into the Marcellus gas play so far, almost three quarters went to land acquisition, said Louis D’Amico, executive director of
But as credit markets collapsed, oil and gas companies no longer had the option of accumulating nonproducing resources at the same rate. A common phrase for 2009 prospectives became “balancing the balance sheet.”
Chesapeake Energy Corp., the nation’s largest natural gas producer and the biggest leaseholder in the Marcellus Shale, drafted a 2009 budget with a $2.2 billion, or 78 percent, reduction in acquisition dollars from last year’s allocation.
Marcellus Shale acreage runner up Range Resources said it will shift its focus on development, cutting leasehold dollars by two-thirds this year. Range currently has 900,000 acres of leased land in Pennsylvania.
“The economy as a whole is experiencing difficult times and companies are being more selective in leasing,” said Ray Walker, vice president of the Appalachia Shale division of Range Resources, in an e-mail.
Denver-based St. Mary Land & Exploration Co., while cautiously announcing its entry into the Marcellus Shale field, told investors it will slash its 2009 exploration and development budget by 54 percent of the 2008 figure.
At least one company is pulling out all together. Canadian-based Unbridled Energy Corp., which set up an office in Sewickley and shelled out a half a million dollars for oil and gas leases in Tioga county, said in late December that it would abandon the venture, along with its interest in 8,000 acres of the Marcellus Shale play, citing “dramatic changes in both the oil and gas industry and the national economy, combined with the extremely tight capital markets.” Instead, the company will focus on developing already held properties in New York.
It is the liquidity crisis, in part, that spurred Moon Township-based Atlas America to “significantly” cut its acquisition budget for 2009, said company President Rich Weber, who declined to disclose a dollar figure for the cuts. “We are still actively seeking additional leases,” in areas strategic to the company’s Marcellus Shale portfolio, he said.
Weber, like others in the field, understands that the lull is not a permanent state. The plunge in energy prices will level and climb back up, said EOG Resources CEO Mark Papa, speaking at last month’s Deloitte Oil & Gas Conference.
“Worldwide oil supply growth prospects are weak and, within five years, oil prices will likely be much higher than today,” his slide show warned.
And while the long-term perspective may soothe long-term worries, gas prices and oil and gas company portfolios are changing to accommodate today.
EOG, one of the largest land holders in the Marcellus Shale, announced Jan. 8 that it will reveal revised production growth targets in February, “due to the current uncertainty in hydrocarbon markets.”
Locally, the good news is that land lulls have spread across the nation.
A few months ago, Bob Dawson, the mid-continent client relations manager with the Texas-based Oil and Gas Clearinghouse, brokered deals where energy companies gobbled up land in Louisiana’s Hainesville Shale at $30,000 per acre.
But just a few days ago, when he tried to unload a property in the same southern rock bed, Dawson couldn’t fetch a single bid.
Frankly, he said, “there was a period of time, six to eight months ago, when people were just way overpaying. You spend $30,000 an acre and you have to drill an $8 (million) to $12 million well.”
Sheppard, who serves as Penn State Extension’s Westmoreland County director, now fields calls from landowners looking to get someone, anyone, interested in leasing their land. He has no answer.
“If the industry is saying ‘Hey, we’ve gotta focus on creating cash flow right now,’ you can understand that,” he said.